Comparative Analysis of Savitzky-Golay and Butterworth Filters for Electrocardiogram De-Noising Using Daubechies Wavelets

Yusuf, Samson Dauda and Maduakolam, Francis Chinomso and Umar, Ibrahim and Loko, Abdulmumini Zubairu and Lumbi, Lucas Williams (2020) Comparative Analysis of Savitzky-Golay and Butterworth Filters for Electrocardiogram De-Noising Using Daubechies Wavelets. Asian Journal of Research in Cardiovascular Diseases, 2. pp. 15-29.

[thumbnail of Yusuf212020AJRCD57328.pdf] Text
Yusuf212020AJRCD57328.pdf - Published Version

Download (639kB)

Abstract

Introduction: Electrocardiogram (ECG) provides a wealth of information and remains an essential part of the assessment of cardiac patients. However, noise distortions associated with the signal could lead to wrong interpretation and diagnosis.

Aim: To carry out an extensive comparative analysis of Savitzky-Golay (S-G) and Butterworth filters for ECG de-noising using Daubechies wavelets in a MATLAB version 2015a.

Methodology: Noisy ECG signals downloaded from physionet.org under MIT-BIH arrhythmia database were de-noised using S-G and Butterworth filters displayed in both time and frequency domains. A quantitative evaluation was done to assess the performance of the filters for Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), Mean Square Error (MSE) and Signal to Interference Ratio (SIR). The results of SNR for this work are compared with the results of other researches with other methods.

Results: Experimental result for de-noising with Butterworth filter shows abnormal spiky waves in time domain quite unusual in morphology of the original waves and in the frequency domain creates image signals which are indications of noise and baseline drift. While S-G filter maintains the signal power constant and only tries to decrease the noise power with peak preservation. Performance analysis for SNR, MSE and SIR using Butterworth filter gives mean values of 1.63 dB, 0.2036 and 0.259 dB, while that of S-G filter gives 32.78 dB, 0.0001 and 1852.358 dB respectively.

Discussion: Significant reduction of noise by S-G filter and retaining the ECG signal morphology effectively as compared to Butterworth filter is an evident that S-G filter delivers better performance results as compared to Butterworth filter in terms of noise separation, artifacts and baseline drifts.

Conclusion: The importance of ECG de-noising filters and the criteria for their selection must be clearly understood by hospital managements and cardiac health centers for good quality ECG in diagnosis and therapy for cardiac diseases.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Open Article Repository > Medical Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@openarticledepository.com
Date Deposited: 29 Mar 2023 05:46
Last Modified: 12 Aug 2024 10:17
URI: http://journal.251news.co.in/id/eprint/880

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item